Friday, April 24, 2009

Daily Recap: Friday, 4/24

Anatomy and Physiology:
We watched a two part video called Body Story: Spreading Menace. In the first part, we were introduced to Mike, who unfortunately ate some bad chicken and came down with a case of food poisoning. In the second part, we spent some time with George, who, in order to impress a certain special lady, went on a crash diet to try to lose weight. These stories supplement the digestive system material that we're currently covering in class.

Biology:
Owl pellet dissections.

That which scares me

Reports like this from Reuters:

This week's top stories

Since it's Friday, I thought I'd run down my top news stories for this week:

1. The lone survivor of the band of Somali pirates that hijacked the freighter Maersk Alabama on April 8 arrived in New York this week and will face federal charges there as an adult. Let's just say it's been a long time since the US has tried and convicted anyone of piracy...

2. The US Supreme Court heard arguments about whether or not public school administrators went too far when they strip searched a student whom they suspected of hiding ibuprofen in her underpants. Here's what should happen...the court will rule that the school administrators, while having a duty to protect other students by conducting a reasonable search for suspected contraband, went WAY OVER THE LINE by forcing her to disrobe. That announcement will be followed by record demand for SecretPocket underwear.

3. There was continued talk about the government's use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" (i.e. TORTURE).

4. Environmental activists around the world celebrated Earth Day on Wednesday.

5. The economy still sucks.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Say "Pepsi, please!"

Today in anatomy class we mentioned that one of the primary secretions of the stomach is an enzyme precursor called pepsinogen. In the presence of acid, pepsinogen rapidly changes into pepsin, which is the enzyme that begins the chemical digestion of any proteins that we eat. Obviously, the name of the enzyme pepsin is very similar to one of the most popular beverages in the U.S.*

*Being a Coke drinker, I am hesitant to use the prestige of this blog to formally endorse Pepsi. It should be noted, though, that our school district has an exclusive beverage contract with PepsiCo. In light of that, I will give the soda overlords Pepsi the respect that it mercilessly demands deserves.

In 1893, a pharmacist in New Bern, North Carolina named Caleb Bradham began selling a soda that he called "Brad's Drink". When his drink grew in popularity, Bradham decided to give it a catchier name, and Pepsi-Cola was born.

There are conflicting reports about where the name came from, but they all relate in some way to digestion. Several sources mention the enzyme pepsin as an ingredient in the original recipe. Others say that, while the drink did not contain pepsin, it was thought to have ingredients that made it similar to the enzyme. Still others report that Bradham marketed the drink as a treatment for upset stomachs (dyspepsia) and conclude that the name came from the term for normal digestion (pepsia). Whatever the case, we can rest assured that the name Pepsi is, in one way or another, related to the digestive action of the stomach.

Facebook use linked to lower grades

If you know me then you understand that I'm a fan of Facebook. I've listed it as one of my favorite Internet things. I've shared relevant pointless YouTube videos which it was the topic of. I've engaged in thoughtful discussion of the sociological ramifications of the world's largest social networking website. I've even set it up so that the 5 or 6 of you that actually read this blog can become my fans if you want.

So I'm sure you'll understand my disappointment when I read this, which was published a couple of weeks ago on ScienceDaily (via Freakonomics):
College students who use Facebook spend less time studying and have lower grade point averages than students who have not signed up for the social networking website, according to a pilot study at one university. [...]

While this was a relatively small, exploratory study, it is one of the first to find a relationship between college students’ use of Facebook and their academic achievement.

Typically, Facebook users in the study had GPAs between 3.0 and 3.5, while non-users had GPAs between 3.5 and 4.0.

Personally I can't believe it. It doesn't make sense to me that an engaging technology that provides instant gratification from almost any location by bombarding the senses with an incomprehensible amount of information and quasi-addictive applications could possibly be distracting late adolescents/young adults from their studies. This doesn't necessarily mean Facebook is bad, though, as the study's author is quick to point out that correlation does not, necessarily, prove cause and effect:
“We can’t say that use of Facebook leads to lower grades and less studying – but we did find a relationship there,” said Aryn Karpinski, co-author of the study and a doctoral student in education at Ohio State University. [...]

Karpinski emphasized that the results don’t necessarily mean that Facebook use leads to lower grades.

“There may be other factors involved, such as personality traits, that link Facebook use and lower grades,” she said.

“It may be that if it wasn’t for Facebook, some students would still find other ways to avoid studying, and would still get lower grades. But perhaps the lower GPAs could actually be because students are spending too much time socializing online.”

It should be noted that this is a relatively small pilot study. What this means is that they'll use the data collected to design a larger, more conclusive study. It all involves math and statistical algorithms. I'd explain it in more detail, but I don't have time. I have to update my Facebook status...

Daily Recap: Thursday, 4/23

Anatomy and Physiology:
We continued our discussion of the digestive system with a short section of notes covering the structure and function of the stomach.

Biology:
Today was a work day to allow students to finish up their ecological cycle posters.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Is God friendly?

I had the following conversation with Littlemagette this morning:

Littlemagette (LM): Daddy, when am I going to die?

Mistermagette (MM): Well, hopefully not for a very long time.

LM: How long is a long time?

MM: Probably not until you're an old man.

LM: Daddy, I don't want to be an old man.

MM: Why not?

LM: Because then I'll die.

MM: Well, son, I don't think you need to worry about that right now.

LM: Daddy, is it scary when you die?

MM: Not at all. When somebody dies, everyone is really sad because they miss them. But the person who dies is actually really happy...because they get to go live with God.

LM: Is God friendly?

MM: Yes, son. God is very friendly. He's friendlier than anyone else you've ever met.

LM: You're tricking me, Daddy!

MM: What?

LM: You're being silly...God lives up in the sky and I can't go up in the sky! That's silly.

MM: (changing the subject) So what would you like to do today...?

Name the M

Did you figure out last week's? If not, here's the full picture:

And here's this week's "mystery M":


Good luck!

Daily Recap: Wednesday, 4/22

Earth Day!
Happy Birthday Josh!

Anatomy and Physiology:
We began taking notes over the organs of the digestive system. Today's focus was the mouth, pharynx and esophagus.

Biology:
1. We took our first quiz of the ecology unit (quiz 4.3).
2. Students, working in small groups, began making collage posters to represent their choice of either a nutrient cycle (water, carbon dioxide/oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorous, carbon) or a food web for a particular ecosystem.

Happy Earth Day!

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Daily Recap: Tuesday, 4/21

Happy Birthday Derrick!

Anatomy and Physiology:
We took a few notes that gave an overview of the digestive system. The rest of the period was work time to start on Lab Exercise 41: Organs of the Digestive System.

Biology:
Read textbook section 2.3 over the cycling of matter. The assignment that goes along with this reading is the "Science Notebook" study guide worksheets.

Monday, April 20, 2009

iPod Shuffle

This one's old school, and is sort of an inside joke between myself and Mr. Huber. Congrats to him today.

Martika: Toy Soldiers

Clowns with guns

This is cool. Feel free to leave your opinion on what the story is here in the comments section. Otherwise, just enjoy it...



(via Andrew Sullivan via Videogum)

Daily Recap: Monday, 4/20

Investigating Technologies:
Today is the first day in our new harbors! Interval 1 should take about one week.

Anatomy and Physiology:
Each group of students paid tribute to their rat during our rat memorial service. There was time at the end of the period for anyone that didn't finish the exam on Friday. This officially concludes our rat unit.

Biology:
We took notes covering the flow of energy through ecosystems (text section 2.2). These are a continuation of the notes we started last week and are available on the class website as "Intro to Ecology".

Left Brain/Right Brain


While most of us* understand that the human brain is divided into right and left halves called hemispheres, the relationship of those hemispheres to each other and how they work together to control the body isn't understood quite as well.

*When I say that most of us understand this, I should probably mention that many of us SHOULD understand this...especially if you've taken my anatomy and physiology class. If you HAVE taken that class, and you DID NOT know that the cerebrum is divided into hemispheres separated by the logitudinal fissure and connected to each other by the corpus collosum, then maybe I really am the worst teacher in the history of the world.

Last week, a new article by Carl Zimmer was posted to Discovery Magazine's website. It's a really interesting piece about why our brain are halved, and what the physiological ramifications of that separation are. It begins with asking why we have a bi-hemispherical brain in the first place:
...Scientists have spent a lot of time pondering this very question. Their best answer has a lot to do with the form and evolutionary history of our bodies. From early in our development as embryos, humans take on a left-right symmetry that eventually gives rise to our two eyes, our two big toes, and every paired structure in between. All vertebrates are symmetrical in the same way, as are butterflies, scorpions, and a vast number of other invertebrates. This left-right structure is probably inherited from the common ancestor of all bilaterally symmetric animals, a creature that apparently emerged over 570 million years ago.
One of the greatest benefits to this type of symmetry, according to Zimmer, was that animals with a set of limbs on each side of their bodies would have been able to escape from predators more easily and quickly. And the development of a bilateral body plan effected how sense organs such as eyes and ears evolved. It makes sense, then, that the evolution of brains would follow that same pattern...and in fact we see bilateral brains in even the simplest chordates.

Even though the two hemispheres of our brains are mirror images of each other, they do not contribute equally to neurological processes. Like other organs in our bodies, the right side and the left side have evolved to perform different functions in different ways:
Of course, our bodies are not perfectly symmetrical (heart on the left, appendix on the right), and neither are our brains. Some regions are slightly bigger on one side than on the other, and these differences translate into imbalances in how the human brain works. Most people, for example, tend to favor their right hand over their left. In the mid-1800s, the French physician Paul Broca discovered a region on the left side of the brain that is essential for language; damage to Broca’s area, as it is called, leaves people unable to talk. The same region on the right side is not so vital. Another area, on the underside of the brain, is important for recognizing people’s faces. The right half of this region, known as the facial fusiform area, does most of the work of recognizing. In fact, if people view a face only through their left eye (which is linked to the brain’s right hemisphere), they will do a better job of recognizing it than if they use only their right eye.
This neural asymmetry (referred to as lateralization) has become a widely recognized phenomenon and is supported by numerous studies. The question that neurologists ask, though, is what is the purpose of lateralization...how does it benefit our species.
One hypothesis is that a lateralized brain is more powerful than one that works like a mirror image. Instead of two matching parts of the brain performing an identical task, one can take charge, leaving the other free to do something else. Lesley Rogers, a biologist at the University of New England in Australia, tested this hypothesis on chickens [and found that] the birds use their left hemisphere to peck for seeds and their right hemisphere to detect predators. Some chickens have more lateralized brains than others [which] allowed the chicks to multitask more effectively, with each eye handling a separate job.
Zimmer cites examples from studies using parrots, toads, fish, bees, and even humans to support this idea that lateralized brains evolved as a "multi-tasking" tool.**

**This is a handy trait for those times when one has to walk and chew gum at the same time...or chase their prey while aiming a spear at it.

We need to be careful, though, to understand that the two hemispheres do not operate independently of each other. They still communicate and coordinate with each other in intricate and often unknown ways. And while each of use may use one hemisphere of our brain more often or more efficiently than the other, it would be inappropriate to draw the conclusion that one side of our brain is solely responsible for our perceptions, thoughts, and behaviors.
No matter how lateralized the brain can get, though, the two sides still work together. The pop psychology notion of a left brain and a right brain doesn’t capture their intimate working relationship. The left hemisphere specializes in picking out the sounds that form words and working out the syntax of the words, for example, but it does not have a monopoly on language processing. The right hemisphere is actually more sensitive to the emotional features of language, tuning in to the slow rhythms of speech that carry intonation and stress.[...] Neuroscientists know that the hemispheres work together and that they do so by communicating through the corpus callosum. But exactly how the hemispheres cooperate is not so clear.
There is nothing in nature that comes close to rivaling the complexity of the human mind. It is, at the same time, that which connects us to the rest of nature and makes us uniquely human. As we continue to learn more about the function of this remarkable organ, we will only grow in our understanding of both who we are as a species and how we came to be.

Sunday Comics

Yesterday's Foxtrot comic...perhaps dedicated to Mr. Keltner?