Posts
But it should be pointed out that we're not the only state that's having this discussion. In fact, Texas is currently discussing proposed revisions to their science standards. At issue is whether the following language:
The student is expected to analyze, review, and critique scientific explanations, including hypotheses and theories, as to their strengths and weaknesses using scientific evidence and information.
Should be replaced with:
The student is expected to analyze and evaluate scientific explanations using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and experimental and observational testing.
"Strengths and weaknesses" language is a tactic commonly used by opponents to evolution as a way to weaken the credibility of certain theories (like evolution) that are perceived to be in conflict with their religious beliefs.
As always, the National Center for Science Education has a great summary of these proceedings on their website.
Personally I totally believe that a student shouldn't be forced to agree or to even do indepth research if it does go against there religous beliefs. But I also think that religion shouldn't get in the way of our learning experiences in school
ReplyDeleteOne of the problems that I have with the anti-evolution movement is this idea that teachers are brainwashing their students to "believe" something that's against their faith. It's extremely important that teachers understand that a student's religious views are fundamental to who that student is as a person. To trample on that would be unforgivable.
ReplyDeleteHowever, it would be dishonest for a biology teacher to not teach evolution for what it is. Namely (1) the cornerstone of modern biological knowledge, and (2) an extremely valid and well-supported theory. The controversy surrounding evolution exists in society, not in the scientific community. And it's important that we teach it that way.
I'll have more on this in a later post.